Business

Peru must revise Las Bambas environmental impact study, say experts

Chinese companies must and involve communities and ‘do homework’ on new investment environments

Violent conflicts at the Chinese-owned Las Bambas copper mine Peru, which claimed the lives of four people last month, can be avoided in future if companies make more effort to understand investment environments and engage with local communities, experts have told Diálogo Chino. Located near the town of Chalhuahuacho in the Apurimac region, Las Bambas is one of the largest copper mining projects in the world. But its development has been met with resistance by the local community following five modifications to the environmental impact assessment (EIA). Last week, Peruvian NGO CooperAcción recommended that the Peruvian government revise the EIA for Las Bambas as “it no longer represents the realities” of the situation there. Community leaders agreed to end the protest at the mine earlier this month following a round-table dialogue with representatives from the local and national governments. But lessons need to be learned, says CooperAcción, which has urged the government to ensure greater input from local communities in decisions made with Chinese investors, many of which are state-owned and secure deals through direct negotiations with host governments. “It’s the best way to avoid confrontations in the future,” says economist Julia Cuadros, one of the founders of CooperAccion, which has been monitoring the social and environmental impacts of the Peruvian mining industry since 1977. Beijing-based lawyer Edwin Lee, of the firm Dacheng, who specializes in China’s overseas investments, says Las Bambas’ Chinese owner MMG should, for their part, have “done their homework” on past conflicts in Peru’s mining sector. Lee adds that MMG inherited many existing problems at Las Bambas from the previous owners, the Swiss Glencore-Xstrata. Pipeline According to Cuadros, copper from Las Bambas was originally supposed to be transported to the nearby Tintaya mine for processing via a pipeline. From Tintaya, the metal would then travel to the port of Arequipa. But Tintaya, which was also owned by Glencore and which has now been deactivated, was left out of the Las Bambas deal, meaning copper now has to be processed on site. By eliminating the pipeline, MMG has vastly increased the fleet of trucks transporting the processed ore from Las Bambas to port. “There are 225 trucks leaving full and coming back empty every day,” said Cuadros, adding that explorations into the mineral deposits at Las Bambas will also increase, causing a greater volume of waste at the site. “No one has made a serious evaluation of the consequences of these changes and what impact they will have on the environment and the local population,” Cuadros said. “The local population was outraged because they only heard about the decisions after they were made,” she claims, adding that this has led to fears that the environmental impacts will be greater than first thought. More mining, more conflict Mining was responsible for 5% of Peru’s gross domestic product (GDP) and more than half of its exports in 2013. With nearly 200 mines in operation, the country is among the leading international producers of silver, gold, lead, zinc, and copper. Of the 25 current projects open to foreign investment, at least 15 have been called into question by the local communities. According to statistics from the Peruvian government, social conflicts relating to mining have tripled since 2008. La Bambas had experienced comparatively little conflict, until recently. “The local communities have always been favorable to mining,” says Manuel Glave of the Group for the Analysis of Development (GRADE). “There was an arrangement with the companies to compensate the residents of the region, economically as well as with social projects,” he said, adding that the current situation has been complicated by the mine’s multiple owners and a lack of communication with MMG. “The problems did not arise because China took over the project,” said Lee, according to whom Chinese companies now face a “great challenge” in learning to deal with countries in which public pressure can have a big influence on their ventures. “In Africa, which lacks more democratic regimes and legislation, they encounter less resistance on the part of the population,” says Lee, adding that compliance with the law and adapting to the rules in new markets in Latin America is “very important”. In its report, CooperAcción also accuses the Peruvian authorities of the maltreatment of protesters in using the private company facility to interrogate those detained. “This is a practice from the times of the dictatorship, which only adds to the population’s distrust of the corporations,” Cuadros said.    

-->
Cookies Settings

Dialogue Earth uses cookies to provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser. It allows us to recognise you when you return to Dialogue Earth and helps us to understand which sections of the website you find useful.

Required Cookies

Required Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Dialogue Earth - Dialogue Earth is an independent organisation dedicated to promoting a common understanding of the world's urgent environmental challenges. Read our privacy policy.

Cloudflare - Cloudflare is a service used for the purposes of increasing the security and performance of web sites and services. Read Cloudflare's privacy policy and terms of service.

Functional Cookies

Dialogue Earth uses several functional cookies to collect anonymous information such as the number of site visitors and the most popular pages. Keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website.

Google Analytics - The Google Analytics cookies are used to gather anonymous information about how you use our websites. We use this information to improve our sites and report on the reach of our content. Read Google's privacy policy and terms of service.

Advertising Cookies

This website uses the following additional cookies:

Google Inc. - Google operates Google Ads, Display & Video 360, and Google Ad Manager. These services allow advertisers to plan, execute and analyze marketing programs with greater ease and efficiency, while enabling publishers to maximize their returns from online advertising. Note that you may see cookies placed by Google for advertising, including the opt out cookie, under the Google.com or DoubleClick.net domains.

Twitter - Twitter is a real-time information network that connects you to the latest stories, ideas, opinions and news about what you find interesting. Simply find the accounts you find compelling and follow the conversations.

Facebook Inc. - Facebook is an online social networking service. China Dialogue aims to help guide our readers to content that they are interested in, so they can continue to read more of what they enjoy. If you are a social media user, then we are able to do this through a pixel provided by Facebook, which allows Facebook to place cookies on your web browser. For example, when a Facebook user returns to Facebook from our site, Facebook can identify them as part of a group of China Dialogue readers, and deliver them marketing messages from us, i.e. more of our content on biodiversity. Data that can be obtained through this is limited to the URL of the pages that have been visited and the limited information a browser might pass on, such as its IP address. In addition to the cookie controls that we mentioned above, if you are a Facebook user you can opt out by following this link.

Linkedin - LinkedIn is a business- and employment-oriented social networking service that operates via websites and mobile apps.